Human evaluation infrastructure

Human Evaluation for Safer, More Reliable AI

HumanlyAI provides certified evaluators for RLHF preference data, safety assessment, hallucination detection, and compliance-ready model oversight — so your systems don’t just sound right, they are right.

RLHF Preference Ranking Safety (Safe / Borderline / Unsafe) Hallucination Detection Gold Datasets & Calibration

Typical pilot turnaround: 7–14 days. Ongoing pods available for continuous evaluation.

Who this is for

AI product teams shipping copilots and assistants

Enterprise GenAI teams needing reliability + auditability

Model builders running RLHF or safety eval cycles

If your model updates weekly, your evaluation pipeline needs to keep up — with consistent human judgment.

Why human evaluation

AI capability is accelerating faster than human oversight

Modern LLMs are fluent and confident — yet still hallucinate, overclaim, and sometimes produce harmful guidance. Automated checks help, but teams still need defensible human judgment to catch safety failures and reliability gaps before users do.

Hallucinations & false authority

Confident answers can be wrong, fabricated, or misleading — especially in high-stakes domains.

Safety + reputational risk

Unsafe outputs can create user harm, legal exposure, or immediate trust loss.

Scaling RLHF is hard

Reliable evaluators are difficult to recruit, train, calibrate, and maintain over time.

Services

What HumanlyAI provides

Choose one-off evaluations, pilots, or dedicated evaluator pods.

RLHF Preference Data

  • Pairwise preference ranking
  • Structured rubrics + rationales
  • Model comparison and regression checks

AI Safety Evaluation

  • Safe / Borderline / Unsafe scoring
  • Refusal quality & policy adherence
  • Harm analysis for realistic user impact

Hallucination Detection

  • Fabrication flags (facts, citations, numbers)
  • Overconfidence & false precision detection
  • Factual accuracy scoring (0–5)

Gold Datasets & Calibration

  • Create gold tasks and ground truth
  • Agreement tracking + drift detection
  • Ongoing evaluator recalibration

How it works

End-to-end evaluation pipeline

1) Scope & Inputs

You share prompts, model outputs, and evaluation goals (safety, accuracy, tone, policy).

Inputs can be CSV/JSON exports or platform integrations.

2) Evaluate with Rubrics

Certified evaluators score each response using standardized dimensions and definitions.

Safety, hallucinations, accuracy, tone, overall quality.

3) Quality Control

We audit work with gold datasets, agreement thresholds, and reviewer checks.

Consistency matters more than speed.

4) Deliver Results

You receive structured scores, findings, and recommended next actions.

Ready to feed into RLHF training loops or safety reporting.

Why HumanlyAI

Trained + certified evaluators — not crowd work

Certification gate

Evaluators pass training + quiz + gold dataset agreement thresholds before client work.

Safety-first scoring

Clear definitions for Safe / Borderline / Unsafe and strict “no Unsafe → Safe” policy.

Calibrated quality

Gold data, QA review, and ongoing recalibration to keep evaluations consistent over time.

Engagement model

Simple pilots, then scale

Pilot

Validate rubric + workflow on a small set.

Best for first-time evaluation programs.

Subscription

Monthly evaluation cycles for evolving models.

Best for weekly model updates.

Dedicated Pods

Retained evaluators + QA lead for your team.

Best for enterprise scale + continuity.

Want exact pricing? It depends on volume, domain complexity, and QA depth. We’ll propose a pilot scope in one call.

FAQ

Common questions

Do evaluators need to be domain experts (lawyers, doctors)?

Not always. For most tasks, we train evaluators to judge risk, credibility, and rubric compliance. For specialized domains, we can add domain-trained evaluators or an expert QA layer.

Can you work with our existing tooling?

Yes. We can deliver structured outputs (JSON/CSV) or operate within evaluation platforms, depending on your workflow.

Contact

Request a pilot

Email us with a short description of your use case (model type, domain, evaluation goals, and timeline). We’ll respond with a pilot plan.